ContributionArc
Write To The Top · Scholar tier

Discover the contribution only you can make.

ContributionArc maps a scholarly conversation, finds the gap only you can fill, and engineers your argument — so writing is the last step, not the first.

For graduate students & professors · built on a structured, end-to-end method

The method

The arc from question to contribution

Most tools teach writing. ContributionArc helps you map a scholarly conversation, locate the gap only you can fill, and engineer the argument before a single paragraph is drafted.

  1. 00Live

    Your Scholarship

    Where does this sit in my own work?

    Before mapping the field, map yourself. Your ContributionArc — the recurring themes, through-line, and open threads of your prior work — becomes the baseline this paper advances.

    Your ContributionArc baselineRecurring themesOpen threads

    ORCID · OpenAlex

  2. 01Live

    Mapping the Scholarly Conversation

    Who is talking, and about what?

    Ingest the literature and surface the major schools of thought, key authors, dominant theories, points of agreement and dispute, and emerging trends.

    Concept mapTimelineComparison tablesVenn diagrams

    OpenAlex · Semantic Scholar · Zotero

  3. 02Preview

    Lattice Analysis

    How does the reasoning actually hold together?

    Decompose each position into claims, evidence, and assumptions. Rate how well each claim is supported and find the concepts that bridge multiple theories.

    The Knowledge LatticeSupport-strength heatmapAssumption ledger

    Semantic Scholar · Crossref

  4. 03Live

    Gap Discovery

    What can I say that hasn't been said?

    Detect the six kinds of research gap across the lattice and rank the five most promising opportunities for an original contribution.

    Ranked opportunity boardGap dossiersPromise × feasibility matrix

    OpenAlex · Semantic Scholar · arXiv / PubMed

  5. 04Preview

    Contribution Design

    What, precisely, is my contribution?

    Draft your own one-sentence contribution claim, then have Claude pressure-test it against the chosen gap — the claim stays yours; Claude critiques and asks the questions a committee would.

    Your contribution claimCommittee-style critiqueQuestions to sharpen it

    OpenAlex · Semantic Scholar

  6. 05Preview

    Thesis Architecture

    How do I argue it?

    You architect the argument — a central claim and the supporting claims that establish it — and Claude pressure-tests the logic: whether the supports hold, what's missing, and which counterarguments you must answer.

    Your argument skeletonCoherence critiqueCounterarguments & questions

    Zotero · Crossref

  7. 06Live

    Scholarship Advancement

    How does this advance my body of work?

    Re-map your personal ContributionArc with this new contribution inside it — what it bolsters, extends, synthesizes, or complicates among your own prior work, and how it moves your program forward.

    Updated ContributionArcBefore → after diffAdvancement narrative

    ORCID · OpenAlex

  8. 07Live

    Final Positioning

    Where, exactly, did I land in the field?

    Rebuild the field positioning map using the actual thesis you defended — the earned position, diffed against the rough placement you started from in Phase 01.

    Final positioning mapInitial → final diffUpdated field dashboard

    OpenAlex · Semantic Scholar

  9. 08Preview

    Manuscript Construction

    Now I write.

    Draft each section with real-time margin guidance that ties every paragraph back to the architecture you engineered.

    Structured editorLive margin guidanceSection ↔ architecture links

    Overleaf · Zotero · Crossref

Phase 01 · in action

Watch the conversation map itself

Drop in your sources and ContributionArc extracts the schools of thought, key authors, dominant theories, and points of dispute — then draws them as a living concept map you can interrogate.

  • Garnet edges trace where the field disagrees.
  • Hover any node to follow a school across the literature.
  • Every node is grounded in a real, cited source.
Scholarly conversation concept mapCognitivismSocioculturalVygotskyZPDCognitive LoadSwellerFormative FeedbackGen-AI TutorsAutomation BiasLearner Agency
scroll to zoom · drag to pan
SchoolAuthorTheoryTrend
Many minds, one workspace

The right engine for each kind of thinking

ContributionArc orchestrates best-in-class models — each used where it genuinely excels, not interchangeably. Every call runs server-side and is logged for cost and quality.

  • Claude

    Reasoning, gap discovery, margin guidance

  • OpenAI

    Embeddings & semantic source search

  • Perplexity

    Live literature discovery

  • Gemini

    Long-context paper ingestion

  • Tavus

    Conversational committee personas

“The hardest part of a dissertation was never the writing. It was knowing what I could say that hadn’t already been said.”

The problem ContributionArc was built to solve

Stop asking “what should I write?” Start asking “what can only I contribute?”

Open the workspace
ContributionArc — Discover your contribution.